MicroXML is for hand | automated generation from Dave Pawson on 2012-07-25 (public-microxml@w3.org from July 2012)

From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 07:44:58 +0100
To: MicroXML <public-microxml@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAEncD4c+Smi6QOSqUvJ9bB=WHsj0wEt72LxXw3XSZU3vhpmK=g@mail.gmail.com>

James said "Maybe we should add something like "MicroXML shall support
the use of
text editors for authoring" as a goal."

One quite simple positive for uxml (for me) is to ease human comprehension,
for an author. I.e. the handwritten document should be the prime use case.

On that basis I would see automated generation as secondary.

regards


-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2012 06:45:30 UTC