Re: Why MicroXML ?

Hans Franke scripsit:

> I think a steamlined description along a simple standard way and
> pushing all special cases into an apendix might work. I would love
> to stand corrected, but I can't realy find a lot in the XML specs to
> be thrown out or what could be simplified by reduced definitions. The
> way how we teach XML could make the difference we are looking for.

I am not sure I follow you, but if you compare my Editor's Draft with the
XML Rec plus the Namespace, Infoset, xml:id, and xml:base Recs, you'll
see just how much smaller it is: 68 pages vs. 9 pages.

-- 
As you read this, I don't want you to feel      John Cowan
sorry for me, because, I believe everyone       cowan@ccil.org
will die someday.                               http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
        --From a Nigerian-type scam spam

Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2012 21:01:21 UTC