- From: Mike Sokolov <sokolov@falutin.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 10:03:26 -0400
- To: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
- Cc: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>, public-microxml <public-microxml@w3.org>
On 07/24/2012 09:51 AM, Mike Sokolov wrote: > On 07/24/2012 09:43 AM, James Clark wrote: >> How does what you are looking for differ from Canonical XML? >> >> James >> > At base the idea is similar, but the proposal here is to recommend > that MicroXML parsers should reject (mark as ill-formed, report, > handle as an exceptional case in some way) documents that are not in > (some) canonical form. Or - sorry for the hasty response - pesky work is calling - the requirement that the data model incorporate differences that had previously been regarded as insignificant. Maybe Canonical XML does this - I'm not intimately familiar with it. Maybe it has not been successful, and that is an indication that this proposal has similar legs. > > Mike >
Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2012 14:04:10 UTC