- From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 08:44:28 +0100
- To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Cc: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>, public-microxml <public-microxml@w3.org>
>> What is the benefit of HTML5 friendliness? I see this more for the >> back end used in all the places xml is used now - config files, simple >> data storage, simple messages etc > > In those places the price of XML has already been paid: they have no reason > to convert to MicroXML. Ah ok, I still see people 'paying the price' every day, struggling with namespaces, encoding, the apis, making simple changes. > If MicroXML is going to be useful, it's going to be > in places where there is no XML at present, IMO. That doesn't leave many places does it? :) -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com
Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2012 07:44:58 UTC