- From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 02:06:14 +0700
- To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Cc: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>, public-microxml@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CANz3_EaXSGc7CQqBDz0UE=kK91P9pBe-Z=-5KoRiSNdjyDtgow@mail.gmail.com>
Why does script have a PP of html? On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:01 AM, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote: > Henry S. Thompson scripsit: > > > For HTML (4, as then was), out of 77 elements, 52 had a preferred > > parent in the schema I used, for 51 of which it was 'div', (the 52nd > > was div itself, whose preferred parent was 'body'). > > Here's TagSoup's current view: > > html does not have a PreferredParent. > > body, frameset, head, noframes, script have a PP of html. > > base, isindex, link, meta, style, title, bgsound have a PP of head. > > frame has a PP of frameset. > > dd, dt have a PP of dl. > > button, fieldset, input, label, select, textarea have a PP of form. > > legend has a PP of fieldset. > > optgroup, option have a PP of select. > > area has a PP of map. > > param has a PP of object. > > caption, col, colgroup, tbody, tfoot, thead have a PP of table. > > tr has a PP of tbody. > > td, th have a PP of tr. > > li has a PP of ul. > > All other known elements have a PP of body. > > -- > John Cowan cowan@ccil.org http://ccil.org/~cowan > The known is finite, the unknown infinite; intellectually we stand > on an islet in the midst of an illimitable ocean of inexplicability. > Our business in every generation is to reclaim a little more land, > to add something to the extent and the solidity of our possessions. > --Thomas Henry Huxley >
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2012 19:08:10 UTC