- From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 18:43:12 +0700
- To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Cc: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>, public-microxml@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2012 11:44:01 UTC
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 6:35 PM, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote: > > You once said that you thought the appropriate MicroXPath was XPath 1.0, > presumably modulo namespaces, PIs, etc. Have you had any further > thoughts about that? > Though it pains me to say it, I suspect the most appropriate MicroXPath is CSS3 selectors. James
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2012 11:44:01 UTC