- From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 00:32:22 -0400
- To: Mike Sokolov <sokolov@falutin.net>
- Cc: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>, micro xml <public-microxml@w3.org>
Mike Sokolov scripsit:
> From the viewpoint of somebody entirely new to MicroXML and XML, I
> imagine the existence of special xml: attributes would appear to be
> an unusual historical anomaly. For a specification that is concerned
> with designing an extensible semantics-free syntax, the inclusion of
> a small number of reserved names with semantics attached just seems
> weird. Why those semantics, in particular?
I'm no longer proposing that the semantics be in the spec.
--
Business before pleasure, if not too bloomering long before.
--Nicholas van Rijn
John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Received on Saturday, 18 August 2012 04:32:45 UTC