- From: David Lee <David.Lee@marklogic.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 09:30:41 -0700
- To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>, Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- CC: "public-microxml@w3.org" <public-microxml@w3.org>
if attributes xml:* is allowed but reserved. What is the data model for the QName of say xml:abc (ignore for now "abc" is not yet defined ... I want to avoid pulling in the other specs). Localname = "abc" ? Localname = "xml:abc" ? If the former then we need a namespace for QNames in the data model (to distinguish from an attribute "abc" ) If the later we break XML1.0+NS compatibility in the data model. I am all for making it a syntax error to have colons in names AND using xmlns as an attribute name. That way ALL uXML documents can be parsed with an XML1.0+NS parser and we have a chance of a reasonable compatible data model. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- David Lee Lead Engineer MarkLogic Corporation dlee@marklogic.com Phone: +1 650-287-2531 Cell: +1 812-630-7622 www.marklogic.com This e-mail and any accompanying attachments are confidential. The information is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this e-mail communication by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately by returning this message to the sender and delete all copies. Thank you for your cooperation.
Received on Thursday, 16 August 2012 16:31:10 UTC