- From: Uche Ogbuji <uche@ogbuji.net>
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 15:34:51 -0600
- To: public-microxml@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAPJCua0grp7q5zdUz2wMr0RcGYOisejJND7PjxGtpuLTc+ytmg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 3:30 PM, James Clark <jjc@jclark.com> wrote: > On Thursday, August 16, 2012, John Cowan wrote: > >> >> On reflection, I'd like to see option A-prime, in which colons are not >> allowed except in the form "xml:something". >> > > I am confused. How is this different from Option C? > C. the xml: [prefix] is reserved, and must only be used for > attributes described in the spec I think the difference is that no statement of reservation, and no definition of xml:* attributes in the spec. I was going to remark that John's proposal is more like a C-prime, but that seems nit-picky. So according to John's separate thread there would still be a general statement of reservation of [xX] [mM] [lL], a la XML 1.0's, but not with self-reference to the MicroXML spec for the permitted uses. -- Uche Ogbuji http://uche.ogbuji.net Founding Partner, Zepheira http://zepheira.com http://wearekin.org http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/ http://copia.ogbuji.net http://www.linkedin.com/in/ucheogbuji http://twitter.com/uogbuji
Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2012 21:35:19 UTC