- From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 23:20:18 -0400
- To: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Cc: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>, Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>, micro xml <public-microxml@w3.org>
Liam R E Quin scripsit: > What would you suggest? Allowing recovery without defining it is what > led to the HTML bug-for-bug compatibility arms race. Not that anyone > ever explicitly allowed it... I don't think that will happen with MicroXML, for the same reason that I don't believe in XML5. MicroLark's push and pull parsers return error events when they detect an error, but if you resume them, you'll get more events. I think this does not violate the XML Rec's rules. The tree builder, on the other hand, gives up and discards the tree when it sees an error, so it is draconian in the usual sense. -- Her he asked if O'Hare Doctor tidings sent from far John Cowan coast and she with grameful sigh him answered that http://ccil.org/~cowan O'Hare Doctor in heaven was. Sad was the man that word cowan@ccil.org to hear that him so heavied in bowels ruthful. All she there told him, ruing death for friend so young, James Joyce, Ulysses algate sore unwilling God's rightwiseness to withsay. "Oxen of the Sun"
Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2012 03:20:40 UTC