Re: Subset Data Model

David Carlisle scripsit:

> So given that html5 compatibility is another possible motivating
> factor of micro-xml and that
> 
> <math><mfrac><img src="a"/><img src="b"/></mfrac>
> 
> parses as both xml and html  and presumably parses as micro-xml as well
> is it really absurd to ask that the micro-xml parse not only reports
> that the file is well formed but that it reports the same tree as
> xml not the tree that the html parser reports, which is
> 
> <math><mfrac/></math><IMG src="a"/><IMG src="b"/>

Fortunately for us, this document is invalid HTML, and as such not part
of the MicroXML use case.

-- 
On the Semantic Web, it's too hard to prove     John Cowan    cowan@ccil.org
you're not a dog.  --Bill de hOra               http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

Received on Tuesday, 14 August 2012 00:12:23 UTC