- From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 08:17:33 +0700
- To: David Lee <David.Lee@marklogic.com>
- Cc: "liam@w3.org" <liam@w3.org>, Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>, Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@gmail.com>, public-microxml <public-microxml@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CANz3_Eam1Aic8ovyTR_45qWRsjKmKKWnrQk1g4rC9QGj4GBJOg@mail.gmail.com>
That would be incompatible with XML. On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 8:13 AM, David Lee <David.Lee@marklogic.com> wrote: > A little off the wall and probably dumb ... but .... just to make sure > Is there any reason that <? xxx ?> has to be recognized as anything other > than text ? That is, does it need to be part of the data model ? > Could it not just be valid text content ? > PHP wouldn't care ... other processors could look for <? xxx ?> within > text nodes instead of expecting a PI node. > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > David Lee > Lead Engineer > MarkLogic Corporation > dlee@marklogic.com > Phone: +1 650-287-2531 > Cell: +1 812-630-7622 > www.marklogic.com > > This e-mail and any accompanying attachments are confidential. The > information is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is > addressed. Any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this > e-mail communication by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the > intended recipient, please notify us immediately by returning this message > to the sender and delete all copies. Thank you for your cooperation. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Liam R E Quin [mailto:liam@w3.org] > > Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 6:05 PM > > To: Jirka Kosek > > Cc: John Cowan; James Clark; Andrew Welch; public-microxml > > Subject: Re: Starting point > > > > On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 23:42 +0200, Jirka Kosek wrote: > > > On 25.7.2012 3:01, Liam R E Quin wrote: > > > > > > > But, losing xml-stylesheet and <?php?> might be too big a price. > > > > > > I don't think that PHP is argument for preserving PIs. > > > > I'm more trying to make sure there's a complete perspective than arguing > > a position - <?php...?> is widely used today, and that syntax was > > introduced in fact for XML use. > > > > > > > more complex scripts will step out from XML well-formdness anyway. > > > > Also often true. > > > > On the other hand, <?publisher page-break?> is also a strong use case. > > But could be equally well done with a comment. > > > > Liam > > > > > > > -- > > Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ > > Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ > > Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml > > > >
Received on Friday, 3 August 2012 01:18:21 UTC