Re: WebCodecs - incoming liaison statement from ITU-T SG16

Hi Media working group participants,

For your information, we have received a thank you note from ITU-T SG16 
on the reply we prepared and sent:

[[
We thank you for the information about the WebCodecs API and for 
encouraging the development of a W3C WebCodecs registration for improved 
use of Rec. ITU-T H.266 | ISO/IEC 23090-3 Versatile video coding (VVC) 
in web browsers. We have encouraged our members to study the information 
you provided and to participate in the work on development of an 
appropriate registration, with consideration of open issues and comments 
via your GitHub repository (at https://github.com/w3c/webcodecs).
]]

No further action requested.

Thanks,
François.


------ Original message ------
From: "Dale Curtis" <dalecurtis@google.com>
To: "Chris Needham" <chris.needham@bbc.co.uk>
Cc: "François Daoust" <fd@w3.org>; "public-media-wg@w3.org" 
<public-media-wg@w3.org>
Date: 02/12/2022 18:03:41

>Thanks Chris, this lgtm!
>
>- dale
>
>On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 5:42 AM Chris Needham <chris.needham@bbc.co.uk> 
>wrote:
>>I have written an initial draft reply to the ITU-T SG16 liaison 
>>statement on WebCodecs.
>>
>>https://github.com/w3c/media-wg/blob/main/liaisons/2022-10-28-itu-t-sg16.md
>>
>>Please share your input in GitHub. PRs to edit the draft are welcome. 
>>In particular, this needs input and review from WebCodecs editors and 
>>implementers.
>>
>>We can also use our next Media WG call on December 13 to discuss and 
>>finalise the reply.
>>
>>Many thanks,
>>
>>Chris (for the Media WG co-chairs)
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Chris Needham <chris.needham@bbc.co.uk>
>>Sent: 21 November 2022 11:36
>>To: François Daoust <fd@w3.org>; public-media-wg@w3.org
>>Subject: RE: WebCodecs - incoming liaison statement from ITU-T SG16
>>
>>Thank you Francois. I suggest we prepare a reply, so I started a draft 
>>here:
>>
>>https://github.com/w3c/media-wg/blob/main/liaisons/2022-10-28-itu-t-sg16.md
>>
>>I'm happy to write, but need input from WebCodecs implementers and 
>>editors:
>>
>>* Current implementation status and plans for each browser engine
>>* Future plans for the spec - e.g., integration points, 
>>https://github.com/w3c/media-pipeline-arch
>>* Any specific comments on H.266 (VVC)? Implementer interest?
>>
>>The liaison statement requests a reply before 11 January 2023.
>>
>>Please share your input in GitHub - PRs to add to the draft are 
>>welcome. We can also use our next Media WG call on December 13 to 
>>discuss and collect input.
>>
>>Many thanks,
>>
>>Chris (for the Media WG co-chairs)
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: François Daoust <fd@w3.org>
>>Sent: 15 November 2022 15:24
>>To: public-media-wg@w3.org
>>Subject: WebCodecs - incoming liaison statement from ITU-T SG16
>>
>>Hi Media working group,
>>
>>W3C received an incoming liaison statement, attached to this email, 
>>from the ITU-T Study Group 16, addressed at the Media working group 
>>and focused on WebCodecs (main spec and Codec registry).
>>
>>Abstract is:
>>
>>[[
>>This liaison statement notes recent developments in W3C on the W3C 
>>WebCodecs specification and the W3C WebCodecs Codec Registry 
>>specification. It welcomes the consideration of recent standards 
>>developed by ITU-T SG16 in these specifications and suggests the 
>>consideration of Versatile Video Coding (VVC, Rec. ITU-T H.266 | 
>>ISO/IEC
>>23090-3) in future work on this subject.
>>]]
>>
>>The liaison statement requests "information from the W3C Media Working 
>>Group about its ongoing efforts and future plans regarding these W3C 
>>WebCodecs and W3C WebCodecs Codec Registry specifications".
>>
>>It also informs "the W3C Media Working Group about the recent 
>>development of Rec. ITU-T H.266 | ISO/IEC 23090-3, which may be 
>>relevant for future inclusion into the W3C WebCodecs Codec Registry 
>>specification".
>>
>>For discussion in the group!
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Francois.

Received on Friday, 31 March 2023 08:14:50 UTC