- From: Joscha Jaeger <joscha.jaeger@filmicweb.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 16:59:47 +0100
- To: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Hello all, thanks for your valuable work. I have a question regarding the spatial dimension syntax: In 4.2.2 of the latest spec, it says dimensions shall be described by "4 comma-separated integers". While that might be suitable for pixel values, integers are highly impractical for percentage values, as the accuracy depends on the size of the media element. >From a frontend perspective, spatiotemporal fragments (e.g. annotations) on responsive websites will most likely be defined in percentage values, as the actual dimensions of the media file are often unknown and the dimensions of the media element are subject to dynamic changes. Were there any special reasons for limiting the dimensions to integers? If not, I would like to suggest a change towards floats (1*DIGIT [ "." *DIGIT ]), to allow more accuracy. I know it's been some time since the spec has been updated, but hopefully the activities will be "lifted to the spotlight again" ;). Best regards, Joscha -- filmicweb Joscha Jaeger joscha.jaeger@filmicweb.org http://filmicweb.org +49.177-7896559 @OpenHypervideo http://de.linkedin.com/in/joschajaeger
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2017 16:42:05 UTC