W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > May 2015

Re: Informal (dynamic) Media Fragments URI discussion

From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 13:33:07 -0700
Cc: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>, "Olivier.aubert@univ-nantes.fr" <Olivier.aubert@univ-nantes.fr>, Pierre-Antoin Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>, Thomas.Kurz@salzburgresearch.at, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Message-id: <B0615A17-B5AD-4B73-8E1C-9DA709C78AA2@apple.com>
To: Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com>
Interesting.  I’m not at www2015, but I hope to help.  Have a good discussion!

I guess one major question is to what extent the other shapes, or the dynamism, can be expressed inside the same or another media file, and how much you can pack into a fragment syntax!

> On May 20, 2015, at 10:15 , Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> The topic of extending Media Fragments URI by allowing for (i) more than rectangular shapes for spatial fragments and also (ii) dynamic (moving) spatial fragments has come up repeatedly in the recent weeks. We want to profit from the fact that some of us are at WWW 2015 to have an informal chat about how to get this started formally :-)
> For (ii), here are my first thoughts on the topic: https://github.com/tomayac/dynamic-media-fragments
> We agreed (with those I could ask) to meet on Thursday, 13:00, at the MicroSoft™ booth. I have CC'ed the mailing list for full transparency and to gather comments from those who could not be here. 
> Looking forward to seeing you all. 
> Best,
> Tom
> -- 
> Dr. Thomas Steiner, Employee, Google Inc.
> http://blog.tomayac.com, http://twitter.com/tomayac
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
> iFy0uwAntT0bE3xtRa5AfeCheCkthAtTh3reSabiGbl0ck0fjumBl3DCharaCTersAttH3b0ttom.hTtP5://xKcd.c0m/1181/

David Singer
Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Thursday, 21 May 2015 20:33:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:27:52 UTC