- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 11:24:03 +0100
- To: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
- Cc: public-media-fragment@w3.org
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> wrote: > Cool, do you think it should go in a separate spec or how do you want > to organize it? I think we might end up not using URL fragments for this after all. See the thread on the WHATWG list. They're problematic for supporting addressing within the zip archive. > I must ask though, why is it necessary to support non-UTF-8 encodings > for Zip URLs at all? Zip resource names are byte sequences, because they didn't bother to abstract that to strings somehow in time. > I'll also note that Presto actually supported something like this, but > I think it was only used internally (for skin files) and the syntax > was (I think) foo.zip/fileinzip. We can't really do that. URLs today can look like that and would be fine. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 29 August 2013 10:24:34 UTC