- From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 16:36:37 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, Davy Van Deursen <davy.vandeursen@ugent.be>, Erik Mannens <erik.mannens@ugent.be>
- cc: public-media-fragment@w3.org
On Fri, 18 May 2012, Raphaël Troncy wrote:
> Dear Silvia,
>
>> We have a few comments now - how do we go about fixing them without
>> going through the whole process again?
>
> Since there are editorial comments, I will make a change proposal and we will
> do a short telecon early June to validate all of them before going happily
> into full recommendation. We are close to the end.
As early june is quite far, I made a snapshot version of what the REC
would look like, implementing the two proposed changes, one for the "bad"
example [1] and one for the clarification of intent [2]. See the diff doc
at [3] to find those edits.
Raphael, Silvia, Erik, Davy, is that ok for you?
Cheers,
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2012May/0001.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2012May/0000.html
[3] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/snapshot/rec/basic/diff-mediafrag.html
--
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.
~~Yves
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2012 20:36:41 UTC