Re: minutes of 2012-01-04 teleconference

2012/1/5 Davy Van Deursen <davy.vandeursen@ugent.be>:
> On 4/01/2012 12:15, Raphaël Troncy wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> For the record, the minutes of today's phone telecon is at
>> http://www.w3.org/2012/01/04-mediafrag-minutes.html (and in text format
>> below).
>
> [[SNIP]]
>
>> Raphael: Should we clarify what are the setup data we send?
>> ... see message from Pierre Yves,
>> [16]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2011De
>> c/0023.html
>> ... so in the recipes, by "codec setup data", do we meant codecs
>> setup data _and_ the time/space index tables (e.g.
>> stts/ctts/stsc/stsz/stco/stss atoms, in ISO 14496-10)?
>>
>> [16]
>>
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2011Dec/0023.html
>>
>> Erik: I can ask Davy for clarifications in his implementations
>
>
> As Pierre-Yves correctly indicates in the mail mentioned above, the term
> 'codec setup data' is not well defined in our spec I think. In particular,
> 'codec setup data' from a media fragments point of view consists of
> - setup data for the decoder (such as resolution, quantification parameter,
> ...);
> - timing information (i.e., when to display a certain frame);
> - track information (i.e., which tracks are present and how does the raw
> samples relate to these tracks).
>
> Note that this is independent of the MP4 container format (e.g., a WebM file
> also contains these three kinds of information).
>
> Should we find another term or should we just clarify this in the text
> (e.g., by means of a definition for 'codec setup data')?

I would suggest a clarification in the text. What you have written
above is great!

Cheers,
Silvia.

Received on Friday, 6 January 2012 22:09:43 UTC