- From: Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 10:26:20 +0100
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Cc: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Hi Silvia, > Just wanted to mention that in future it will be easier to describe > what kind of URI composition we enable by using URI templates - > specified at http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-gregorio-uritemplate-08.txt That's good news indeed. > I am not happy though that the ampersand-separated way is not standard > for fragment expansion - maybe we need to provide input on the I-D. > They've got it covered for queries though. While I like your idea to get ampersand-segmented fragment expansion properly specified, I was wondering whether it is indeed the standard way to do it. I did very limited research, but couldn't find Web applications using it (probably due to my limited research). I found a couple of Web apps using something like fragment "paths" à la #/some/encoded/state. Do you have representative pointers? > What do you think? I would love to see it spec'ed, simply, wanted to see who supports it first. Best, Tom -- Thomas Steiner, Research Scientist, Google Inc. http://blog.tomayac.com, http://twitter.com/tomayac
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2012 09:30:43 UTC