- From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 18:47:37 -0400
- To: public-media-fragment@w3.org
I'm sorry for a late comment - I only became aware of this spec today, or rather that it applied to images. For images, Media Fragments URI 1.0 appears to say how to interpret a fragment identifier to take a copped portion of an image. This raises two questions, for me at least. First, what if a media fragment syntax is registered for a media type such as JPEG or TIFF, e.g. through IETF? Which takes precedence and why? I believe it necessary for this specification to make that clear. Second, current practice for HTML user agents includes scaling of images to fit a specified rectangle. One can easily envision other transformations, such as those included in SVG. How would one extend the notation defined in Media Fragments URI 1.0 to support a sequence of transformations, and not only offset and crop? e.g. to scale horizontally by 50% would it be xySwh=160,120,0.5,320,240 or should implementers wishing to add such functionality use a syntax like xywh=160,120,320,240,hscale=0.5 ? There doesn't seem to be a way to say which version of Media Fragments one is using, so a clear statemnt about extensibility is very important. Thank you, Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2012 22:51:27 UTC