Re: Yet another illegal test case: TC0019-UA

Thomas,

On 17/11/2011 14:43, Thomas Steiner wrote:
> Hi Davy, all,
>
>> Yup, I agree, but I would change it to t=smpte:0:00:03:15.00,0:00:07 (the
>> '15' was meant as frames, otherwise we need some interlaced video content
> Makes sense. I have followed your proposal in my local tests. Could
> you update the test case accordingly? I made the same error with the
> SMPTE time specification in my own unit tests, I have corrected them
> accordingly. All tests pass now, and the bug you noticed before with
> the trailing dot is corrected. I'll push in a minute and quickly
> update the other thread with the changes.
I've updated the three testcases (TC0019-UA, TC0080-UA, and TC0081-UA).

Best regards,

Davy

-- 
Davy Van Deursen

Ghent University - IBBT
Department of Electronics and Information Systems - Multimedia Lab
URL: http://multimedialab.elis.ugent.be/dvdeurse

Received on Thursday, 17 November 2011 13:51:57 UTC