- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 21:25:51 +1000
- To: Thomas Steiner <tsteiner@google.com>
- Cc: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>, Thomas Steiner <tomac@google.com>, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>, Malte Ubl <malteubl@google.com>
Hi Thomas, It already does almost everything that would be required by a validator: parse the thing and return the components. All it needs to do is state whether it's valid/invalid and when it's invalid what errors it found parsing the URL. This would implement some of the errors that we are currently discussing - at least all of those that a UA cannot parse. (Of course it cannot actually check if a start/end time is within the duration of a file etc.) Don't make it any more complicated than that. Cheers, Silvia. On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Thomas Steiner <tsteiner@google.com> wrote: > Hi Silvia, > > It could be turned into a validator service, yes. What interface would > you imagine? > > validator.example.org/{uri} and the thing returns boolean, or the > parsed dime sions in JSON form? Or something with a real UI (more like > an app)? > > What do you/all others think? > > Thanks, > Tom > > Thank God not sent from a BlackBerry, but from my iPhone > > On 06.05.2011, at 07:00, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote: > >> 2011/3/22 Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>: >>> Hi Thomas, >>> >>>> OK, found the issues: >>>> - Strict mode (https://developer.mozilla.org/en/JavaScript/Strict_mode) >>>> caused more issues than it solved. Removed for now. >>> >>> I have tried http://tomayac.com/mediafragments/mediafragments.html this >>> morning. It still works on Chrome, *not* on Firefox 3.6+, Opera 11+, IE8+. >>> >>>> - Safari (not even 5.0.4) does not support ISO 8601 dates (shame). >>>> Handling this correctly in the library now. >>> >>> I have seen your tweet about this. Did you file somewhere a bug report? Did >>> you get an answer from Apple? We have Dave and Eric in the group who might >>> help to follow up this bug. >>> >>> The home page of the media fragment includes now the announcement of this >>> implementation. >> >> Is this eventually going to be turned into a validator for media fragment URIs? >> >> It would be nice to capture all our recent discussions about error >> handling in such an application... >> >> Silvia. >
Received on Friday, 6 May 2011 11:26:38 UTC