W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > June 2011

Re: splitting HTTP section or not?

From: RaphaŽl Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 22:03:18 +0200
Message-ID: <4E00F906.1090202@eurecom.fr>
To: Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>
CC: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Dear all,

Thanks Jack for having opened this thread and list the various 
alternatives and to the ones who have voiced their opinion.
My personal opinion is your "Cop out" third way:

> - We leave MF-HTTP in for now, but state that from the moment 2
> complying implementations of the non-MF-HTTP bits are available we
> will wait no longer than 3 months (or any other period of time) for
> complying implementations of MF-HTTP. Any bits of MF-HTTP that
> haven't been implemented by two or more parties by then go out of the
> spec, and if none the the MF-HTTP stuff has been imeplemtned it goes
> into a note wholesale.

I would indeed let the spec as it is in its current state and make a 
broad call for implementations now. We can see what has _actually_ been 
implemented in a few months, when we are ready to transition to PR and 
at this stage see what (non implemented) parts need to be taken out of 
the spec and might be included in a simple note.

   RaphaŽl

-- 
RaphaŽl Troncy
EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
2229, route des CrÍtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France.
e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2011 20:03:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:52:46 UTC