- From: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 22:03:18 +0200
- To: Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>
- CC: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Dear all, Thanks Jack for having opened this thread and list the various alternatives and to the ones who have voiced their opinion. My personal opinion is your "Cop out" third way: > - We leave MF-HTTP in for now, but state that from the moment 2 > complying implementations of the non-MF-HTTP bits are available we > will wait no longer than 3 months (or any other period of time) for > complying implementations of MF-HTTP. Any bits of MF-HTTP that > haven't been implemented by two or more parties by then go out of the > spec, and if none the the MF-HTTP stuff has been imeplemtned it goes > into a note wholesale. I would indeed let the spec as it is in its current state and make a broad call for implementations now. We can see what has _actually_ been implemented in a few months, when we are ready to transition to PR and at this stage see what (non implemented) parts need to be taken out of the spec and might be included in a simple note. Raphaël -- Raphaël Troncy EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France. e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2011 20:03:58 UTC