- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 08:51:40 -0800
- To: Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>
- Cc: Davy Van Deursen <davy.vandeursen@ugent.be>, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
me too On Dec 28, 2010, at 13:46 , Jack Jansen wrote: > > On 24-Dec-2010, at 15:05 , Davy Van Deursen wrote: > >> Same here, an appendix or a separate document doesn't matter for me. As long as RTSP can be published while at the same time we can reach CR in January. > > > Same for me. > > I see a slight procedural advantage to a separate note, namely that that note will disappear when it is eventually superseded by a true standards track document, where this is a bit difficult for an appendix of the spec. OTOH, having the RTSP stuff together with the other MF stuff is a win for implementors. And the chance that RTSP-MF would get standardised separately from MF 2.0 is probably very small anyway. > -- > Jack Jansen, <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>, http://www.cwi.nl/~jack > If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma Goldman > > > David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Monday, 3 January 2011 16:52:14 UTC