- From: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:49:11 +0200
- To: public-media-fragment@w3.org
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 21:43:31 +0200, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org> wrote: > On Sat, 9 Apr 2011, Jack Jansen wrote: > >> I'm not thrilled by extending the xywh syntax beyond what we have >> (pixels and integer percentages), nor by dropping percentages >> altogether. > > Same, integer percentages are not meant to do aspect adaptation, there > was an 'aspect' keyword in earlier versions, and it was dropped, but > maybe in version 2... > Integer percentages are to address simple use cases, like "50%", not for > complex things like aspect ration adaptation that may require some > specific things (16:9 -> 4:3 is not always a fixed crop) What are the use cases for always cropping (say) 50% of the video with a precision that gets worse the bigger the video gets and where using the pixel syntax is not an option? -- Philip Jägenstedt Core Developer Opera Software
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2011 08:49:43 UTC