- From: Davy Van Deursen <davy.vandeursen@ugent.be>
- Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 19:10:54 +0200
- To: "'Silvia Pfeiffer'" <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Cc: "'Media Fragment'" <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Hi Silvia, > as the HTML spec is moving to last call, we should probably get more active in having the media fragment URI uses integrated into it. > I have forwarded the timeline that they are proposing to follow. > > The key right now is that we should probably register a bug in the bug tracker for any spec text that we want to see entered for media > fragment support. The deadline is 1st October. > > I am concretely thinking about: > * support for temporal media fragment URIs in the @src attributes of media elements and what effect they have. > * the use of spatial media fragment URIs in the @src attribute of img elements. > > What do ppl think? Maybe at OVC/FOMS the groups of us that is there can have a chat about it? What is the reason to pick only a subset of the spec? For instance, why no spatial fragment URIs in the media elements and what about track media fragment URIs? Best regards, Davy -- Davy Van Deursen Ghent University - IBBT Department of Electronics and Information Systems - Multimedia Lab URL: http://multimedialab.elis.ugent.be/dvdeurse
Received on Thursday, 23 September 2010 17:18:44 UTC