- From: Chris Double <cdouble@mozilla.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:30:20 +1300
- To: public-media-fragment@w3.org
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> wrote: > > Having read that thread, it seems to me that SMPTE should be treated as > labels, not as something to be converted into a timecode. In other words, if > the resource doesn't contain these SMPTE labels, then one can't use the > format. I'd be happy with the spec saying as much and simply not supporting > the syntax, as neither Ogg nor WebM can embed SMPTE timecodes. I'm inclined to agree. Chris. -- http://www.bluishcoder.co.nz
Received on Thursday, 21 October 2010 09:31:00 UTC