- From: Davy Van Deursen <davy.vandeursen@ugent.be>
- Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 16:30:22 +0100
- To: 'Raphaël Troncy' <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
- Cc: "'Media Fragment'" <public-media-fragment@w3.org>, "'Erik Mannens'" <erik.mannens@ugent.be>
Raphaël, > > Regrets for this phone conf, I will be in a project meeting. > > Regarding my open actions (192 and 195), I completed these during the > > F2F at TPAC so you can close them. > > Regarding the ACTION-192 "update the specification to state what the processing should do when media fragments request (time > dimension) does not match exactly how the media item has been encoded " > ... I cannot find the text that clarifies this in the section 5 or 5.2. > Where did you put it? you can find it in Section 6.2.5. I put it there, next to the other error cases. > > Regarding the ACTION-195 "add a paragraph in the section 7.1 to specify that video, audio, img or any href is all treated similarly (range > request issued when facing a media fragment)" > ... I can read the following paragraph in the section 7.1: > > "If the UA follows the scenario specified in section 5.1.2 Server mapped byte ranges, then it is recommended that when a media > fragment identifier is detected in a URI (independent of the underlying MIME-type of the resource behind the URI), a RANGE request > is sent to the server. > If the MIME-type turns out to be a media type, the server will interpret the RANGE request as specified in section 5.1.2 Server > mapped byte ranges, otherwise it will just ignore the RANGE header." > > Should we first say that this media fragments URI must happen in a specific context, i.e. within a <audio> or <video> element and > *only* for the time dimension in order to trigger this so-called optimistic processing of media fragments? Agreed after reading today's minutes. > I also observe this is a contentious issue, and we will need to see if browsers want to implement this. This is also related to ACTION- > 197. Hmm, maybe we should remove then this paragraph from section 7.1, extend it with your above remarks and put it into the intro of Section 5? I can't see the difference between action-195 and action-197 ... Best regards, Davy -- Davy Van Deursen Ghent University - IBBT Department of Electronics and Information Systems - Multimedia Lab URL: http://multimedialab.elis.ugent.be/dvdeurse
Received on Wednesday, 24 November 2010 15:30:54 UTC