- From: erik mannens <erik.mannens@ugent.be>
- Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 09:24:40 +0200
- To: <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
- Cc: "'Media Fragment'" <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Regrets from Davy, but Action-154 taken car of. Talk to you in about an hour. Erik -----Original Message----- From: public-media-fragment-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-fragment-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Raphaël Troncy Sent: dinsdag 18 mei 2010 16:56 To: Media Fragment Cc: Erik Mannens Subject: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 19 May, Telecon 0900 UTC Dear Media Fragmenters, Please, find below the agenda for this week telecon http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=19&month=05&year=20 10&hour=09&min=00&sec=0&p1=0 Actions opened: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/open Best regards. Erik & Raphaël ------------ AGENDA Teleconference W3C Media Fragments Working Group telephone conference 2010-05-19 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Wednesday, 19 May *09:00-10:00 UTC* Local time: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=19&month=05&year=20 10&hour=09&min=00&sec=0&p1=0 19 May 2010, 0900 UTC 0200 (West US) 1000 (Galway) 1100 (Amsterdam, Sophia-Antipolis, Pretoria) 1800 (Tokyo) 1900 (Sydney) Bridge US: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim) Bridge FR: +33.4.89.06.34.99 Bridge UK: +44.117.370.6152 Conference code : 3724# (spells "FRAG") Duration : 60 minutes ------------------------------------------------------------------- IRC channel : #mediafrag on irc.w3.org:6665 W3C IRC Web Client : http://irc.w3.org/ and http://www.w3.org/Project/IRC Zakim information : http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim Zakim bridge monitor : http://www.w3.org/1998/12/bridge/Zakim.html Zakim IRC bot : http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html ------------------------------------------------------------------- Chair: Erik, Raphael ScribeList: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/ScribeList Scribe: Silvia (On Deck: Conrad, Michael) Regrets: none Please note that Media Fragments WG telecons are for attendance by members and invited experts only. 1. ADMIN: * Roll call * PROPOSED to accept the short minutes of the 12 May 2010 telecon: http://www.w3.org/2010/05/12-mediafrag-minutes.html * ACTION-119: Yves to request admins to set up a cvs notifications mailing list and notifications * ACTION-162: Raphael to provide practical information for the next F2F meeting 2. USE CASES & REQUIREMENTS * ACTION-156: Conrad to add a "bandwidth conservation use case" 3. SPECIFICATION: 3.1 Media Fragment URI syntax: (Yves) * ACTION-152: Yves to change the formal syntax to reflect that we don't need a subdelim for selecting multiple tracks but we allow multiple track= in the URI 3.2 Protocol for URI fragment Resolution in HTTP: * ACTION-123: Silvia to come up with ABNF for header syntax * ACTION-154: Davy to add a section 5.2.4 describing his new optimization * ACTION-160: Yves to send an email reporting the issue for track names * ACTION-137: Jack to check that 5.1 is implementable using the protocol 3.3 Rendering of Media Fragments URI in UA: * ISSUE-5 [Jack]: Handling spatial cropping requires information at client-side 3.4 Discovery of 'Track' and 'Named' fragments: * ISSUE-4 [Silvia]: Should we pre-define some track names? * Davy's strawman implementation using ROE: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Nov/0014.html * Silvia's blog post: http://blog.gingertech.net/2009/11/25/manifests-exposing-structure-of-a-comp osite-media-resource/ * Jack's proposal to write up that we should distinguish the mechanism (ROE, MPEG-21) vs the semantics 4. TEST CASES: (Michael) * Corrib test tool: http://ld2sd.deri.org/corrib/ * ACTION-163: Raphael to send a resolution on handling non-existing or illegal fragments to the mailing list * ACTION-146: Jack to identify and add in corrib any missing test cases for temporal fragments * ACTION-147: Michael to add all MF WG members to corrib * ACTION-148: Michael to add a copy TC functionality in corrib * ACTION-149: Michael to come up with a fix for overview vs. edit single TC in corrib * Suggestion of nasty test cases by Philip: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Dec/0015.html 5. ISSUES 5.1 Active: 5.2 Non-Active: * ISSUE-6 [Jack]: Temporal clips that require transcoding * ISSUE-7 [Michael]: User Agent Media Fragment Resolution and Processing * ISSUE-9 [Michael]: Should we have the media type inside the Test Cases? * ISSUE-12 [Raphael]: What's the relationship between Images (CSS) Sprites and the spatial dimension of the Media Fragments URI scheme? * ISSUE-13 [Raphael]: Write a IETF draft for proposing how to register the fragment scheme for all media types * ISSUE-14 [Davy]: How to deal with embedded time stamps * ISSUE-16 [Jack]: Combining axis is probably not going to be done by LC, but we should write somewhere that this is doable 6. IMPLEMENTATION: * ACTION-34: Jack to look at python-url library to see whether he could implement the logic on client side * ACTION-35: Raphael to look at curl and/or wget to see whether the logic could be implemented on client side * ACTION-70: Jack to commit in CVS (code directory) his python code doing the parsing on client side of the media fragment * Someone to investigate whether he could have an implementation in Javascript that does the client-side media fragments parsing? 7. AOB -- Raphaël Troncy EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France. e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/ http://www.ibbt.be/en/disclaimer
Received on Wednesday, 19 May 2010 07:25:51 UTC