Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 12 May, Telecon 0900 UTC

Very sorry, I have to send regrets again, but will be available next week.
My actions continue - hope I find some time early next week.

Cheers,
      Michael

-- 
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html



> From: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@cwi.nl>
> Organization: CWI
> Reply-To: <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
> Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 22:03:24 +0200
> To: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
> Cc: Erik Mannens <erik.mannens@ugent.be>
> Subject: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 12 May, Telecon 0900 UTC
> Resent-From: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
> Resent-Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 20:05:02 +0000
> 
> Dear Media Fragmenters,
> 
> [Apologies for this late notice]
> 
> Please, find below the agenda for this week telecon
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=12&month=05&year=2010
> &hour=09&min=00&sec=0&p1=0
> Actions opened: 
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/open
> 
> Note that this week agenda is pretty much the same than the ones I'm
> sending since several weeks, so it's time to move on and we are
> expecting no regrets.
> 
> I tried to get in touch with Yves without success as he is completely
> unavailable. Therefore, we will re-assign some actions tomorrow, in
> particular A-123 & A-160 from Yves. We will discuss A-161 that Silvia
> has done. Finally, we will discuss a policy regarding the editorship of
> the spec.
> Best regards.
> 
>    Erik & Raphaël
> 
> ------------
> 
> AGENDA Teleconference
> W3C Media Fragments Working Group telephone conference 2010-05-12
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Wednesday, 12 May *09:00-10:00 UTC*
> Local time:
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=12&month=05&year=2010
> &hour=09&min=00&sec=0&p1=0
> 
> 12 May 2010, 0900 UTC
>                0200 (West US)
>                1000 (Galway)
>                1100 (Amsterdam, Sophia-Antipolis, Pretoria)
>                1800 (Tokyo)  
>                1900 (Sydney)  
> Bridge US: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)
> Bridge FR: +33.4.89.06.34.99
> Bridge UK: +44.117.370.6152
> Conference code : 3724# (spells "FRAG")
> Duration : 60 minutes
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> IRC channel          : #mediafrag on irc.w3.org:6665
> W3C IRC Web Client   : http://irc.w3.org/ and http://www.w3.org/Project/IRC
> Zakim information    : http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim
> Zakim bridge monitor : http://www.w3.org/1998/12/bridge/Zakim.html
> Zakim IRC bot        : http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Chair: Erik, Raphael
> ScribeList: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/ScribeList
> Scribe: Silvia (On Deck: Conrad, Michael)
> Regrets: none
> 
> Please note that Media Fragments WG telecons are for attendance by
> members and invited experts only.
> 
> 1. ADMIN:
> * Roll call
> * PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 14 April 2010 telecon:
> http://www.w3.org/2010/04/14-mediafrag-minutes.html
> * PROPOSED to accept the short minutes of the 28 April 2010 telecon:
> http://www.w3.org/2010/04/28-mediafrag-minutes.html
> * PROPOSED to accept the short minutes of the 05 May 2010 telecon:
> http://www.w3.org/2010/05/05-mediafrag-minutes.html
> * ACTION-119: Yves to request admins to set up a cvs notifications
> mailing list and notifications
> * ACTION-92: Erik and Raphael to coordinate the writing of papers
> ** Postpone (new deadline is May 8th 2010)
> * Next WG F2F: http://www.doodle.com/rt7fsz583hgzrcki
> ** Proposal: F2F meeting organized on 15-16 June in EURECOM/Sophia
> Antipolis by Yves and I
> 
> 2. USE CASES & REQUIREMENTS
> 
> * ACTION-156: Conrad to add a "bandwidth conservation use case"
> 
> 3. SPECIFICATION:
> 
> Debate: editorship policy of the specification
> 
> 3.1 Media Fragment URI syntax: (Yves)
> 
> * ACTION-152: Yves to change the formal syntax to reflect that we don't
> need a subdelim for selecting multiple tracks but we allow multiple
> track= in the URI
> 
> 3.2 Protocol for URI fragment Resolution in HTTP:
> * ACTION-123: Yves to come up with ABNF for header syntax
> * ACTION-154: Yves to add a section 5.2.4 describing his new optimization
> * ACTION-160: Yves to send an email reporting the issue for track names
> * ACTION-137: Jack to check that 5.1 is implementable using the protocol
> 
> 3.3 Rendering of Media Fragments URI in UA:
> * ISSUE-5 [Jack]: Handling spatial cropping requires information at
> client-side
> 
> 3.4 Discovery of 'Track' and 'Named' fragments:
> * ISSUE-4 [Silvia]: Should we pre-define some track names?
> * Davy's strawman implementation using ROE:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Nov/0014.html
> * Silvia's blog post:
> http://blog.gingertech.net/2009/11/25/manifests-exposing-structure-of-a-compos
> ite-media-resource/
> 
> * Jack's proposal to write up that we should distinguish the mechanism
> (ROE, MPEG-21) vs the semantics
> 
> 4. TEST CASES: (Michael)
> * Corrib test tool: http://ld2sd.deri.org/corrib/
> * ACTION-161: Silvia to integrate the test cases into the spec
> * ACTION-146: Jack to identify and add in corrib any missing test cases
> for temporal fragments  
> * ACTION-147: Michael to add all MF WG members to corrib
> * ACTION-148: Michael to add a copy TC functionality in corrib
> * ACTION-149: Michael to come up with a fix for overview vs. edit single
> TC in corrib
> * Suggestion of nasty test cases by Philip:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Dec/0015.html
> 
> 5. ISSUES
> 
> 5.1 Active:
> 
> 5.2 Non-Active:
> * ISSUE-6 [Jack]: Temporal clips that require transcoding
> * ISSUE-7 [Michael]: User Agent Media Fragment Resolution and Processing
> * ISSUE-9 [Michael]: Should we have the media type inside the Test Cases?
> * ISSUE-12 [Raphael]: What's the relationship between Images (CSS)
> Sprites and the spatial dimension of the Media Fragments URI scheme?
> * ISSUE-13 [Raphael]: Write a IETF draft for proposing how to register
> the fragment scheme for all media types
> * ISSUE-14 [Davy]: How to deal with embedded time stamps
> * ISSUE-16 [Jack]: Combining axis is probably not going to be done by
> LC, but we should write somewhere that this is doable
> 
> 6. IMPLEMENTATION:
> * ACTION-34: Jack to look at python-url library to see whether he could
> implement the logic on client side
> * ACTION-35: Raphael to look at curl and/or wget to see whether the
> logic could be implemented on client side
> * ACTION-70: Jack to commit in CVS (code directory) his python code
> doing the parsing on client side of the media fragment
> * Someone to investigate whether he could have an implementation in
> Javascript that does the client-side media fragments parsing?
> 
> 7. AOB
> 
> -- 
> Raphaël Troncy
> EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
> 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France.
> e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
> Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
> Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
> Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
> 
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2010 07:57:20 UTC