- From: Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:43:02 +0200
- To: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Cc: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
On 29 jun 2010, at 22:30, Yves Lafon wrote: > The ABNF describe the whole syntax, and then the different parts. There is no need for a multi-step parsing scheme requiring to re-read multiple time the same bytes. > To me "%74=%6ept%3A%310" is not a media fragment. %-escaped values are allowed only where they are allowed (see grammar). Interesting... Unlike Yves, I think the sketched example _is_ a media fragment, but unlike Philip I don't think we need to specify it in our ABNF. My reasoning: the URI spec (or possibly IRI spec, if we decide to go with that one) already specifies how percent-escapes are handled. But: I know we had long discussions about this, so maybe my memory is incorrect here. Please enlighten me... -- Jack Jansen, <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>, http://www.cwi.nl/~jack If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma Goldman
Received on Tuesday, 29 June 2010 20:44:02 UTC