- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 00:18:16 +1000
- To: Davy Van Deursen <davy.vandeursen@ugent.be>
- Cc: Media Fragments Working Group WG <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Well, but we do offer special actions for such formats in HTTP interactions. I'm not sure we should be removing that insight that there is a difference between formats that (basically) require header updates and formats that don't. It's also still done when we use URI query rather than URI fragment. Silvia. On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Davy Van Deursen <davy.vandeursen@ugent.be> wrote: > Dear all, > > I added WebM to the media formats table [1]. Additionally, I also fixed > section 5.5 of the requirements document [2] regarding the 'conditionally > fit' condition. The latter is outdated since we are not modifying headers of > media resources to serve fragments. > > Best regards, > > Davy > > [1] > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-reqs/#fitness-t > able > [2] > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-reqs/#fitness_r > eq > > -- > Davy Van Deursen > > Ghent University - IBBT > Department of Electronics and Information Systems - Multimedia Lab > URL: http://multimedialab.elis.ugent.be/dvdeurse > > >
Received on Wednesday, 23 June 2010 14:19:08 UTC