- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 14:18:08 +1000
- To: Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>
- Cc: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr, Media Fragments Working Group WG <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl> wrote: >> >> On 21 jun 2010, at 15:49, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: >> >>> 5. Clarify "track" dimension >>> I am rather confused right now: how did we decide to do multiple >>> tracks? In some places we talk about several tracks being able to be >>> defined, but only a single track per spec (see 4.3.3 and the >>> examples), and in other places we talk about there only being one >>> track dimension allowed (D.2 3c and 5.1.2, 5.1.2.1). Can somebody >>> clarify? >> >> We decided on multiple tracks recently (I actually seem to remember that you suggested it, because your contacts said that single-track-selection would be useless). But, indeed, most of the text was written when we still thought of single track selection only. > > Yes, multiple tracks. But how? Through multiple track parameters or > through one with semicolon-separated elements? I cannot remember > whether we made an actual decision on that. Once somebody clarifies > this for me, I can fix it either way. I would personally prefer them > all in one track parameter, since that will make the different > dimensions more consistent. I think this example from Ninsuna suggests also that we will put multiple tracks in one track param: http://ninsuna.elis.ugent.be/DownloadServlet/mfwg/fragf2f.ogv?track=ogg_1;ogg_2 Cheers, Silvia.
Received on Tuesday, 22 June 2010 04:19:13 UTC