- From: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@cwi.nl>
- Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2010 16:27:19 +0200
- To: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- CC: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, public-media-fragment@w3.org
> You can only know it's a media resource when you dereference it. > http://www.example.com/map#lat=-16.5&long=-151.7 is a valid Media > Fragment, NOT according to you. It is a valid URI fragment. >> So, I actually disagree with the notion that this is no a valid MF URI >> - it is a valid MF URI - it is just not a valid MF dimension. > > Needless to say that I disagree ;) I'm all for continuing the discussion, at least all the summer and then I wonder how should we move forward: Would a vote be useful? Raphaël -- Raphaël Troncy EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France. e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Wednesday, 7 July 2010 14:29:26 UTC