- From: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
- Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:23:02 +0200
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- CC: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Hi Silvia, > However, assuming you meant > http://www.example.com/football.movie#xywh=10,20,30,40&action=track , > I would agree with the CSS approach. If I am a UA that doesn't know > what to do with action=track, then I will ignore that part of the > fragment's name-value pairs and only interpret the first part. If that > results in giving a cropped video and nothing else, then that is fine. > It is better than ignoring all the name-value pairs and downloading > the full movie! I interpret this answer as a +1 for Philip case. Feel free to tell me if I'm wrong. My reasoning: - http://www.example.com/football.movie#xywh=10,20,30,40&action=track is NOT a valid media fragment according to our ABNF syntax. Nothing is sent to the server in case of a spatial fragment so let's take another example. - http://www.example.com/football.movie#t=10,20&action=track is NOT a valid media fragment according to our ABNF syntax. So there will no Range request issued. The UA will simply get the whole resource ... and I understand this is not what you would like to happen. Raphaël -- Raphaël Troncy EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France. e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Thursday, 1 July 2010 22:25:08 UTC