Friday, 29 January 2010
- Re: Feedback from FOMS
- Zakim reservation for MFWG F2F March 8-9
- Re: Feedback from FOMS
- Re: Feedback from FOMS
- Re: Aligning NPT syntax with RTSP
- Re: Aligning NPT syntax with RTSP
- Re: Aligning NPT syntax with RTSP
Thursday, 28 January 2010
- Re: Feedback from FOMS
- Re: Feedback from FOMS
- Re: Aligning NPT syntax with RTSP
- Re: Feedback from FOMS
- Re: Feedback from FOMS
- Re: Feedback from FOMS
- Re: Feedback from FOMS
- Re: Feedback from FOMS
- Re: Feedback from FOMS
- ISSUE-14 (davy): How to deal with embedded time stamps
- Re: Feedback from FOMS
Wednesday, 27 January 2010
- Re: [Fwd: [closed] [Fwd: weird characters in spec]]
- Re: Feedback from FOMS
- Re: Aligning NPT syntax with RTSP
- [Fwd: [closed] [Fwd: weird characters in spec]]
- Re: Next F2F MF
- Re: Next F2F MF
- Re: Feedback from FOMS
- Re: Aligning NPT syntax with RTSP
- Re: Aligning NPT syntax with RTSP
- Re: Feedback from FOMS
- Re: Feedback from FOMS
- Re: Aligning NPT syntax with RTSP
- Syntax errors in ABNF of Media Fragments URI
- Re: Aligning NPT syntax with RTSP
- Re: Feedback from FOMS
- Re: Aligning NPT syntax with RTSP
- Re: Feedback from FOMS
- minutes of 2010-01-27 teleconference
- Re: Feedback from FOMS
- Aligning NPT syntax with RTSP
- Re: Feedback from FOMS
- Re: spec review
- Re: Feedback from FOMS
- Re: spec review
- Re: Feedback from FOMS
- Re: spec review
- Re: spec review
- Re: spec review
- Re: Feedback from FOMS
- Re: Procesing requirements
- Re: Temporal fragments of media with time stamps
- Re: spec review
- Re: weird characters in spec
- Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 27 January, Telecon 1000 UTC
- Re: Feedback from FOMS
- Re: Feedback from FOMS
- Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 27 January, Telecon 1000 UTC
- Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 27 January, Telecon 1000 UTC
- Re: minutes of 2010-01-20 teleconference
- Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 27 January, Telecon 1000 UTC
- weird characters in spec
Tuesday, 26 January 2010
- Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 27 January, Telecon 1000 UTC
- Re: Temporal fragments of media with time stamps
- Re: Feedback from FOMS
- Re: Temporal fragments of media with time stamps
- Re: Feedback from FOMS
- Re: Temporal fragments of media with time stamps
Monday, 25 January 2010
Wednesday, 20 January 2010
- Re: Next F2F MF
- Re: minutes of 2010-01-20 teleconference
- Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 20 January, Telecon 1000 UTC
- minutes of 2010-01-20 teleconference
- Re: Next F2F MF
- Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 20 January, Telecon 1000 UTC
Tuesday, 19 January 2010
- Re: Temporal fragments of media with time stamps
- RE: Temporal fragments of media with time stamps
- RE: Temporal fragments of media with time stamps
Monday, 18 January 2010
- Re: Procesing requirements
- Re: Temporal fragments of media with time stamps
- Re: Procesing requirements
- Re: Temporal fragments of media with time stamps
- Re: Procesing requirements
- Re: Temporal fragments of media with time stamps
Sunday, 17 January 2010
- Re: Next F2F MF
- Re: Temporal fragments of media with time stamps
- Re: minutes of 2010-01-13 teleconference
- Re: Next F2F MF
- Re: Processing requirements
- Procesing requirements
- Re: spec review
- Re: Next F2F MF
- spec review
Saturday, 16 January 2010
Friday, 15 January 2010
- Re: Temporal fragments of media with time stamps
- Temporal fragments of media with time stamps
- Re: Next F2F MF
Wednesday, 13 January 2010
- Re: Next F2F MF
- Re: Next F2F MF
- Re: Next F2F MF
- Re: Next F2F MF
- Re: Next F2F MF
- RE: Next F2F MF
- minutes of 2010-01-13 teleconference
- RE: Next F2F MF
- Next F2F MF
- Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 13 January, Telecon 1000 UTC
Monday, 11 January 2010
- Re: Processing requirements
- Re: Processing requirements
- Re: Processing requirements
- Re: Processing requirements
Saturday, 9 January 2010
Tuesday, 5 January 2010
- Re: First next phoneconf MF only 13/01/10 !!!
- Re: Processing requirements
- First next phoneconf MF only 13/01/10 !!!
- Re: Processing requirements
- Re: Processing requirements
- Re: Processing requirements
- Re: Processing requirements
- Re: Processing requirements
- Re: Processing requirements