Re: marking some sections as "ready for implementation"

On 3 February 2010 22:02, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote:
> I guess the only requirement is that the UA doesn't retrieve the full
> resource since that is counter-productive. This normally implies byte range
> requests.
>
> But I made it deliberately informative so what you say applies.

I think we have the opportunity to make a normative statement that a
player which is capable of seeking by itself should do so for #t=
fragments.

Of course we can also keep example as informative sections :)

Conrad.

Received on Wednesday, 3 February 2010 13:14:50 UTC