- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 20:47:55 +1100
- To: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr
- Cc: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>, Erik Mannens <erik.mannens@ugent.be>
Re my Action-130: I have just committed a paragraph into section 5.1.4 that hopefully summarises our discussion from last week. See file:///Users/silvia/src/w3c/WWW/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spec/overview.html#processing-overview-interpretation . Cheers, Silvia. 2010/2/3 Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@cwi.nl>: > Dear Media Fragmenters, > > Please, find below the agenda for this week telecon > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=03&month=02&year=2010&hour=10&min=00&sec=0&p1=0 > Actions opened: > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/open > Regrets from my side, I'm in a PhD defense. > Best regards. > > Erik & Raphaël > > ------------ > > AGENDA Teleconference > W3C Media Fragments Working Group telephone conference 2010-02-03 > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Wednesday, 03 February *10:00-11:00 UTC* > Local time: > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=03&month=02&year=2010&hour=10&min=00&sec=0&p1=0 > > 03 February 2010, 1000 UTC > 0200 (West US) > 1000 (Galway) > 1100 (Amsterdam, Sophia-Antipolis, Pretoria) > 1900 (Tokyo) > 2100 (Sydney) > Bridge US: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim) > Bridge FR: +33.4.89.06.34.99 > Bridge UK: +44.117.370.6152 > Conference code : 3724# (spells "FRAG") > Duration : 60 minutes > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > IRC channel : #mediafrag on irc.w3.org:6665 > W3C IRC Web Client : http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc > Other clients are listed at http://www.w3.org/Project/IRC/#Client > Zakim information : http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim > Zakim bridge monitor : http://www.w3.org/1998/12/bridge/Zakim.html > Zakim IRC bot : http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Chair: Erik > ScribeList: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/ScribeList > Scribe: Guillaume (On Deck: Conrad, Silvia) > Regrets: Raphael > > Please note that Media Fragments WG telecons are for attendance by > members and invited experts only. > > 1. ADMIN: > * Roll call > * PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 27 January 2009 telecon: > http://www.w3.org/2010/01/27-mediafrag-minutes.html > * Charter Extension: > ** ACTION-127: Thierry/Yves to look for the charter extension > * ACTION-92: Erik and Raphael to coordinate the writing of papers > ** Target is MTAP SI on Semantic Multimedia, > http://www.samt2009.org/sites/default/files/mtap_cfp_flyer_v1.pdf, Erik will > circulate a draft version soon. > > 2. F2F Meeting: > * Draft Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/FithF2FAgenda > ** Erik: Venue details > ** Thierry: Zakim booked > > 3. SPECIFICATION: > > * ACTION: Raphael to fix the weird character in the spec document > CLOSED: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Jan/0102.html > > 3.1 Media Fragment URI syntax: (Yves) > * Bug in the npt specification: > Philip: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Nov/0023.html > Dom: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Jan/0093.html > * ACTION-126: Yves to follow up on error in ABFN for npt > * ACTION-132: Philip to send to the mailing list a description of a new > issue to be discussed (dealing with decimal for specifying time?) > * Approval of Philip changes: switch to EBNF syntax > > 3.2 Protocol for URI fragment Resolution in HTTP: > * ACTION: Raphael to ask on the mailing list if anybody has any problem with > the changes proposed by Philip > * ACTION-123: Yves to come up with ABNF for header syntax > * ACTION-133: Erik to try to generate some time diagram for the protocol > description in the section 5.2.1.x > * Review of the complete Section 5.2.1 for group approval > * Question of MF URI validity by Philip: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Nov/0023.html > * Suggestion of nasty test cases by Philip: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Dec/0015.html > > 3.3 Rendering of Media Fragments URI in UA: > * ACTION-130: Silvia to draft a new subsection in the Section 5 regarding > the rendering in the UI of media fragments, at least for the temporal > dimension > * Davy: thoughts about other dimensions (spatial, track) > > 3.4 Discovery of 'Track' and 'Named' fragments: > * ISSUE-4 [Silvia]: Should we pre-define some track names? > * Davy's strawman implementation using ROE: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Nov/0014.html > * Silvia's blog post: > http://blog.gingertech.net/2009/11/25/manifests-exposing-structure-of-a-composite-media-resource/ > * Jack's proposal to write up that we should distinguish the mechanism (ROE, > MPEG-21) vs the semantics > > 3.5 Handling of 'Track' and 'ID': > Conrad's proposal (Fragment header): > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Server-parsed_Fragments > > 4. ISSUES > > 4.1 Active: > * ACTION-131: Davy to write down a new ISSUE in the tracker regarding the > problem raised by werner (see also raphael's summary) > > 4.2 Non-Active: > * ISSUE-5 [Jack]: Handling spatial cropping requires information at > client-side > * ISSUE-6 [Jack]: Temporal clips that require transcoding > * ISSUE-7 [Michael]: User Agent Media Fragment Resolution and Processing > * ISSUE-9 [Michael]: Should we have the media type inside the Test Cases? > * ISSUE-12 [Raphael]: What's the relationship between Images (CSS) Sprites > and the spatial dimension of the Media Fragments URI scheme? > * ISSUE-13 [Raphael]: Write a IETF draft for proposing how to register the > fragment scheme for all media types > > 5. TEST CASES: (Michael) > * Corrib test tool: http://ld2sd.deri.org/corrib/ * ACTION-108: Michael to > add the missing test cases in corrib > * ACTION-115: Michael to come up with categorization of test cases wrt > empty, undefined, etc > * ACTION-118: Michael to come up with individual 'normal' test cases (+/-20) > * ACTION-119: Yves to request admins to set up a cvs notifications mailing > list and notifications > * ACTION-129: Michael to move the editorial note > http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-media-frags-20091217/#processing-overview-errors > to the TC (wiki) > > 6. IMPLEMENTATION: > * ACTION-34: Jack to look at python-url library to see whether he could > implement the logic on client side > * ACTION-35: Raphael to look at curl and/or wget to see whether the logic > could be implemented on client side > * ACTION-70: Jack to commit in CVS (code directory) his python code doing > the parsing on client side of the media fragment > * ACTION-71: Michael to investigate whether he could have an implementation > in Javascript that does the client-side media fragments parsing > > 7. AOB > > -- > Raphaël Troncy > EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department > 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France. > e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com > Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 > Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 > Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/ > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 3 February 2010 09:48:51 UTC