Re: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 3 February, Telecon 1000 UTC

Regrets, very sorry. Got visitors today all day. All my actions continue.

Cheers,
      Michael

-- 
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html



> From: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@cwi.nl>
> Organization: CWI
> Reply-To: <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
> Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 08:39:28 +0100
> To: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
> Cc: Erik Mannens <erik.mannens@ugent.be>
> Subject: Media Fragments Working Group: Agenda 3 February, Telecon 1000 UTC
> Resent-From: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
> Resent-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 07:40:32 +0000
> 
> Dear Media Fragmenters,
> 
> Please, find below the agenda for this week telecon
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=03&month=02&year=2010
> &hour=10&min=00&sec=0&p1=0
> Actions opened: 
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/open
> Regrets from my side, I'm in a PhD defense.
> Best regards.
> 
> Erik & Raphaël
> 
> ------------
> 
> AGENDA Teleconference
> W3C Media Fragments Working Group telephone conference 2010-02-03
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Wednesday, 03 February *10:00-11:00 UTC*
> Local time:
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=03&month=02&year=2010
> &hour=10&min=00&sec=0&p1=0
> 
> 03 February 2010, 1000 UTC
>                0200 (West US)
>                1000 (Galway)
>                1100 (Amsterdam, Sophia-Antipolis, Pretoria)
>                1900 (Tokyo)  
>                2100 (Sydney)  
> Bridge US: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)
> Bridge FR: +33.4.89.06.34.99
> Bridge UK: +44.117.370.6152
> Conference code : 3724# (spells "FRAG")
> Duration : 60 minutes
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> IRC channel          : #mediafrag on irc.w3.org:6665
> W3C IRC Web Client   : http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc
> Other clients are listed at http://www.w3.org/Project/IRC/#Client
> Zakim information    : http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim
> Zakim bridge monitor : http://www.w3.org/1998/12/bridge/Zakim.html
> Zakim IRC bot        : http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Chair: Erik
> ScribeList: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/ScribeList
> Scribe: Guillaume (On Deck: Conrad, Silvia)
> Regrets: Raphael
> 
> Please note that Media Fragments WG telecons are for attendance by
> members and invited experts only.
> 
> 1. ADMIN:
> * Roll call
> * PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 27 January 2009 telecon:
> http://www.w3.org/2010/01/27-mediafrag-minutes.html
> * Charter Extension:
> ** ACTION-127: Thierry/Yves to look for the charter extension
> * ACTION-92: Erik and Raphael to coordinate the writing of papers
> ** Target is MTAP SI on Semantic Multimedia,
> http://www.samt2009.org/sites/default/files/mtap_cfp_flyer_v1.pdf, Erik
> will circulate a draft version soon.
> 
> 2. F2F Meeting:
> * Draft Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/FithF2FAgenda
> ** Erik: Venue details
> ** Thierry: Zakim booked
> 
> 3. SPECIFICATION:
> 
> * ACTION: Raphael to fix the weird character in the spec document
> CLOSED: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Jan/0102.html
> 
> 3.1 Media Fragment URI syntax: (Yves)
> * Bug in the npt specification:
> Philip: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Nov/0023.html
> Dom: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Jan/0093.html
> * ACTION-126: Yves to follow up on error in ABFN for npt
> * ACTION-132: Philip to send to the mailing list a description of a new
> issue to be discussed (dealing with decimal for specifying time?)  
> * Approval of Philip changes: switch to EBNF syntax
> 
> 3.2 Protocol for URI fragment Resolution in HTTP:
> * ACTION: Raphael to ask on the mailing list if anybody has any problem
> with the changes proposed by Philip
> * ACTION-123: Yves to come up with ABNF for header syntax
> * ACTION-133: Erik to try to generate some time diagram for the protocol
> description in the section 5.2.1.x
> * Review of the complete Section 5.2.1 for group approval
> * Question of MF URI validity by Philip:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Nov/0023.html
> * Suggestion of nasty test cases by Philip:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Dec/0015.html
> 
> 3.3 Rendering of Media Fragments URI in UA:
> * ACTION-130: Silvia to draft a new subsection in the Section 5
> regarding the rendering in the UI of media fragments, at least for the
> temporal dimension
> * Davy: thoughts about other dimensions (spatial, track)
> 
> 3.4 Discovery of 'Track' and 'Named' fragments:
> * ISSUE-4 [Silvia]: Should we pre-define some track names?
> * Davy's strawman implementation using ROE:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Nov/0014.html
> * Silvia's blog post:
> http://blog.gingertech.net/2009/11/25/manifests-exposing-structure-of-a-compos
> ite-media-resource/
> 
> * Jack's proposal to write up that we should distinguish the mechanism
> (ROE, MPEG-21) vs the semantics
> 
> 3.5 Handling of 'Track' and 'ID':
> Conrad's proposal (Fragment header):
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/Server-parsed_Fragments
> 
> 4. ISSUES
> 
> 4.1 Active:
> * ACTION-131: Davy to write down a new ISSUE in the tracker regarding
> the problem raised by werner (see also raphael's summary)
> 
> 4.2 Non-Active:
> * ISSUE-5 [Jack]: Handling spatial cropping requires information at
> client-side
> * ISSUE-6 [Jack]: Temporal clips that require transcoding
> * ISSUE-7 [Michael]: User Agent Media Fragment Resolution and Processing
> * ISSUE-9 [Michael]: Should we have the media type inside the Test Cases?
> * ISSUE-12 [Raphael]: What's the relationship between Images (CSS)
> Sprites and the spatial dimension of the Media Fragments URI scheme?
> * ISSUE-13 [Raphael]: Write a IETF draft for proposing how to register
> the fragment scheme for all media types
> 
> 5. TEST CASES: (Michael)
> * Corrib test tool: http://ld2sd.deri.org/corrib/ * ACTION-108: Michael
> to add the missing test cases in corrib
> * ACTION-115: Michael to come up with categorization of test cases wrt
> empty, undefined, etc
> * ACTION-118: Michael to come up with individual 'normal' test cases (+/-20)
> * ACTION-119: Yves to request admins to set up a cvs notifications
> mailing list and notifications
> * ACTION-129: Michael to move the editorial note
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-media-frags-20091217/#processing-overview-errors
> to the TC (wiki)
> 
> 6. IMPLEMENTATION:
> * ACTION-34: Jack to look at python-url library to see whether he could
> implement the logic on client side
> * ACTION-35: Raphael to look at curl and/or wget to see whether the logic
> could be implemented on client side
> * ACTION-70: Jack to commit in CVS (code directory) his python code
> doing the parsing on client side of the media fragment
> * ACTION-71: Michael to investigate whether he could have an
> implementation in Javascript that does the client-side media fragments
> parsing
> 
> 7. AOB
> 
> -- 
> Raphaël Troncy
> EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
> 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France.
> e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
> Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
> Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
> Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
> 
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 3 February 2010 08:28:57 UTC