- From: Davy Van Deursen <davy.vandeursen@ugent.be>
- Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 15:05:57 +0100
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- CC: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Same here, an appendix or a separate document doesn't matter for me. As long as RTSP can be published while at the same time we can reach CR in January. Best regards, Davy Op 24/12/2010 13:11, Silvia Pfeiffer schreef: > Oh, if putting RTSP specs in an appendix doesn't stop the spec from > progressing, that would be a clear winner IMHO. > Silvia. > > 2010/12/24 Raphaël Troncy<raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>: >> Dear Dave, >> >>> The poll outlines 3 possibilities, and then has a yes/no possibility >>> to answer, and there is no question (no question mark), so I find >>> myself unable to answer! >> Apologies, I always found difficult to phrase correctly a yes/no question >> while giving the appropriate context. >> As Silvia said, the question was: >> >> "Should the processing of Media Fragment URI over the RTSP protocol be >> described in a separate document with the status of a WG Note?" >> >> and you answered "yes" with the comment "I don't mind, it should be >> published" ... which I understand, you don't mind where it is published. >> >> There is a consensus that this document should be published and be publicly >> available. The question is therefore how and where? The poll is meant to >> decide if the group wants this piece *in* the reck track spec OR *outside* >> the spec (i.e. in the WG Note). >> >> The cost for putting it in the rec track spec is to issue another LC WD. So >> far, Davy and Jack consider this cost as too high. Silvia has a clear >> preference for having this in the spec, but "will not stand in the group's >> way though". Philip introduced a third way: having this part in the spec, >> but as an informal appendix. >> >> I have re-opened the poll so that more people can answer: Erik, Raphael, >> Yves, Thomas, Michael, Conrad, at least ... >> Best wishes. >> >> Raphaël >> >> -- >> Raphaël Troncy >> EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department >> 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France. >> e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr& raphael.troncy@gmail.com >> Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 >> Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 >> Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy
Received on Friday, 24 December 2010 14:06:39 UTC