- From: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
- Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 10:07:28 +0100
- To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- CC: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Dear Dave, > The poll outlines 3 possibilities, and then has a yes/no possibility > to answer, and there is no question (no question mark), so I find > myself unable to answer! Apologies, I always found difficult to phrase correctly a yes/no question while giving the appropriate context. As Silvia said, the question was: "Should the processing of Media Fragment URI over the RTSP protocol be described in a separate document with the status of a WG Note?" and you answered "yes" with the comment "I don't mind, it should be published" ... which I understand, you don't mind where it is published. There is a consensus that this document should be published and be publicly available. The question is therefore how and where? The poll is meant to decide if the group wants this piece *in* the reck track spec OR *outside* the spec (i.e. in the WG Note). The cost for putting it in the rec track spec is to issue another LC WD. So far, Davy and Jack consider this cost as too high. Silvia has a clear preference for having this in the spec, but "will not stand in the group's way though". Philip introduced a third way: having this part in the spec, but as an informal appendix. I have re-opened the poll so that more people can answer: Erik, Raphael, Yves, Thomas, Michael, Conrad, at least ... Best wishes. Raphaël -- Raphaël Troncy EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France. e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Friday, 24 December 2010 09:11:06 UTC