- From: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
- Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:20:21 +0100
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- CC: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Hi Silvia, > Hmm, I'm pretty sure I clicked "no" and I am still calculated as > "yes". What is going on? Your vote is in the "no" column. Davy's vote is in the "yes". See: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/42785/rtsp-processing/results For all: - yes MEANS RTSP goes in a *different* document, that will be a WG Note (not a recommendation) - no MEANS RTSP goes in the *main* recommendation track document, but requires to have another LCWD, implementations and test cases to remain in the final rec. Best regards. Raphaël -- Raphaël Troncy EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France. e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Wednesday, 15 December 2010 13:23:59 UTC