- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 23:52:36 +1000
- To: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <AANLkTi=yM6j=bnFe7Dpz-Swy=eNQRDSdabZ_++p7kyhg@mail.gmail.com>
Wow! I think that makes for a good argument... S. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> Date: Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 9:01 PM Subject: Re: [whatwg] Built-in image sprite support in HTML5 To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, David Weitzman <dweitzman@gmail.com>, whatwg@lists.whatwg.org On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote: > It would, however, be good to have an indication where HTML would like to > see it going. Would it be better for a media fragment URI for images such as > http://example.com/picture.png#xywh=160,120,320,240 to display the full > image with the rectangle somehow highlighted (as is the case with fragment > URIs to HTML pages), or would it be better to actually just display the > specified region and hide the rest of the image (i.e. create a sprite)? What > makes the most sense for images? The CSS Image Values Module ( http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-images/#url ) is currently recommending Media Fragments as a way to sprite out a portion of a resource. We have a note that we're expecting a spec to reference at some point. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 26 August 2010 13:53:28 UTC