- From: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:46:20 +0200
- To: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Dear all, The minutes of today's telecon are available for review at http://www.w3.org/2009/09/30-mediafrag-minutes.html (and in text format below). Cheers. Erik & Raphaël ------ [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ Media Fragments Working Group Teleconference 30 Sep 2009 [2]Agenda [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2009Sep/0151.html See also: [3]IRC log [3] http://www.w3.org/2009/09/30-mediafrag-irc Attendees Present Raphael, Erik, Michael, Silvia_(irc_only), Thierry, Davy Regrets Yves, Jack Chair Raphael Scribe Erik Contents * [4]Topics 1. [5]ADMIN 2. [6]UC and Requirements 3. [7]specification 4. [8]Test Cases 5. [9]implementations 6. [10]AOB * [11]Summary of Action Items _________________________________________________________ <trackbot> Date: 30 September 2009 <raphael> Scribe: Erik <raphael> Scribenick: erik 1.ADMIN ADMIN <raphael> [12]http://www.w3.org/2009/09/23-mediafrag-minutes.html [12] http://www.w3.org/2009/09/23-mediafrag-minutes.html <mhausenblas> +1 <davy> +1 <raphael> +1 +1 <silvia> +1 minutes from 23/09 accepted close action-111 <trackbot> ACTION-111 Provide CVS access to conrad closed UC and Requirements <raphael> [13]http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-req s/ [13] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-reqs/ policy about contributors & editors as of decided in Barcelona F2F everybody should check his/her affiliation ACTIONS 105, 106, 113 ongoing by Raphael <silvia> ACTION 113 has been finished <trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - 113 Raphael suggests section 6 to go to Annex <raphael> yes silvia, thanks :-) <mhausenblas> +1 +1 <davy> +1 close action-113 <trackbot> ACTION-113 Move "Side Conditions" section to requirements doc only closed <silvia> I am not fussed about section 6 staying as section 6 or going into annex - either works <scribe> ACTION: Davy and Erik to review Raphael's documents [recorded in [14]http://www.w3.org/2009/09/30-mediafrag-minutes.html#action01] <trackbot> Created ACTION-116 - And Erik to review Raphael's documents [on Davy Van Deursen - due 2009-10-07]. specification close action-109 <trackbot> ACTION-109 And Davy to write a paragraph in the documents to explain why we don't include this feature in the spec (rationale) based on the group analysis (impact both req and spec documents) closed <silvia> do we have a commit mailing list on the WDs? <raphael> what do you mean by commit mailing list? <silvia> for cvs commits on the WD documents <silvia> they can be mailed out - it is done on all open source projects that I am active on <raphael> you mean a change log section ? <silvia> no, just every "cvs commit" creates an email with the commit message and the diff <silvia> and it is sent out to the group of people working on the code/document <silvia> helps heaps to stay updated on changes <raphael> i'm not sure this is really useful, particularly since some people do just one commit with a lot of changes, and some others, a commit for every characters they change :-) <raphael> Silvia, any word about action-109? <silvia> yeah, I finished that, too :) <raphael> ACTION-110? <trackbot> ACTION-110 -- Silvia Pfeiffer to silvia to Draft a summary starting from her blog post and the 17/09/2009 IRC minutes in the document (role of ? and #) -- due 2009-09-24 -- OPEN <trackbot> [15]http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/110 [15] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/110 <silvia> I finished that <silvia> please feel free to review the changes I made <silvia> raphael: it doesn't matter how many changes are being made - it is really useful - I know it from other projects close action-110 <trackbot> ACTION-110 Silvia to Draft a summary starting from her blog post and the 17/09/2009 IRC minutes in the document (role of ? and #) closed <silvia> but if that is not something W3C typically hook into the commit, then it's too hard <scribe> ACTION: troncy to review Silvia's summary of her blogpost [recorded in [16]http://www.w3.org/2009/09/30-mediafrag-minutes.html#action02] <trackbot> Created ACTION-117 - Review Silvia's summary of her blogpost [on Raphaël Troncy - due 2009-10-07]. postpone discussion on URI-templates? <raphael> I will actually review the whole section 3 <conrad> public commit logs tend to encourage people to commit at a useful frequency, ie. not too often or too infrequently <raphael> We postpone the discussio on: "should we provide one or several URI templates in complement <raphael> of the BNF syntax provided in the spec for the definition of Media <raphael> Fragments URI? rssagent, draft minutes <raphael> ACTION-112? <trackbot> ACTION-112 -- Raphaël Troncy to propose a digest of Conrad and current's proposal regarding the use of existing and custom headers for the communication UA server -- due 2009-09-25 -- OPEN <trackbot> [17]http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/112 [17] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/112 <silvia> yes, I worked over the complete section 3, raphael Raphael will work on Action-112 today as this is a blocking factor for publication <raphael> my actions are still pending Test Cases <mhausenblas> [18]http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spe c/#fragment-dimensions [18] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spec/#fragment-dimensions michael is updating test tool michael's actions are still pending <scribe> ACTION: michael to come up with individual 'normal' test cases (+/- 20) [recorded in [19]http://www.w3.org/2009/09/30-mediafrag-minutes.html#action03] <trackbot> Created ACTION-118 - Come up with individual 'normal' test cases (+/- 20) [on Michael Hausenblas - due 2009-10-07]. <mhausenblas> the TC overview could look like [20]http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/implementation-report/ [20] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/implementation-report/ raphael wonders how test case doc will look like michael ... table of test cases automatically generated raphael ... after publication, implemetors can use this to test their implementation implementations <silvia> I would already use it in the html5 pages to make sure I cover all important test cases davy ... updated MMLab's parser scribe: can handle all the proposed time schemes ... updated range headers (via two firefox add-ins to test) ... would like to have players that can do that ... <raphael> Are these 2 add-ons required: [21]https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/967 and [22]https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/3829? for inspecting headers request and response? [21] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/967 [22] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/3829? scribe: difficult to use content-range header <conrad> davy: do you have an updated URL? [23]http://schutz.elis.ugent.be:8080/DownloadServlet/fragf2f.ogg is 404 [23] http://schutz.elis.ugent.be:8080/DownloadServlet/fragf2f.ogg davy ... these are indeed the add-ons <silvia> raphael: they are not required, but they help you work out what is going on <silvia> you can also create the http headers through javascript <conrad> the problem is that UAs do not understand time Content-Ranges <silvia> I want to work on this as a demo with davy's server <silvia> yeah, everything has to be emulated with javascript right now <conrad> so we need to suggest that UAs display the "start-end/total" values appropriately, eg. in the seek bar <raphael> Davy points out that the instance-length in the content-range headers is ignored by the media player plugin <raphael> Conrad: is it something we need to push to the browser vendors ? <silvia> some of it davy ... server implementation is allright, we just need players that support these extra headers <conrad> firefox 3.5 will use X-Content-Duration to display the seek bar <conrad> value is a floating point number of seconds <raphael> it is to fake it and will work only on firefox ? but worth to test it <conrad> sure within IBBT we will also try to come with a media player that is able to understand all headers <silvia> the point is that browser vendors need to see the impact and understand the usefulness, which is why a javascript implementation is useful AOB <silvia> then they can decide to follow our specifications and implement it natively <conrad> davy: also try putting the urls through validator.annodex.org , just thinking we can update that for such testing <raphael> [meeting adjourned] <silvia> oh cool! early finish! time to go fix some stuff :) <raphael> yep Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: Davy and Erik to review Raphael's documents [recorded in [24]http://www.w3.org/2009/09/30-mediafrag-minutes.html#action01] [NEW] ACTION: michael to come up with individual 'normal' test cases (+/- 20) [recorded in [25]http://www.w3.org/2009/09/30-mediafrag-minutes.html#action03] [NEW] ACTION: troncy to review Silvia's summary of her blogpost [recorded in [26]http://www.w3.org/2009/09/30-mediafrag-minutes.html#action02] [End of minutes] -- Raphaël Troncy EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France. e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/
Received on Wednesday, 30 September 2009 11:47:05 UTC