- From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 05:39:07 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
- cc: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, Raphaël Troncy wrote: > Dear all, > > We knew that the latest blog post from Silvia is brilliant :-) > http://blog.gingertech.net/2009/09/08/uri-fragments-vs-uri-queries-for-media-fragment-addressing/ > > It has triggered some interesting discussions too (read the comments). One of > them is the reason for my question. Philip Jägenstedt wrote > "I also would be surprised if there wasn?t a lot of server software that > assumes that there will be at most 1 Range HTTP header and misbehaves > otherwise." > > A question for you Yves: > - is it allowed to have multiple Range headers in a single HTTP request? Sure. > - how the server is supposed to interpret it if this is the case? > a) Ignore the Range request and serve the whole content > b) Pick the first Range and serves it > c) Pick a random Range among the ones specified and serves it > d) Undefined :-( None of those, the server will either serve the whole content if it doesn't support multi-ranges, or send the multiple ranges using a mime multipart wrapper (multipart-byteranges, even if not restricted to bytes). Note that in that case there is no Content-Range in the response, as you will get mutiple Content-Ranges in the multipart-byterage. See httpbis [1][2]. [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-07#section-3.1 [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-07#appendix-A > Cheers. > > Raphaël > > -- Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras. ~~Yves
Received on Thursday, 10 September 2009 09:39:17 UTC