- From: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:12:12 +0200
- To: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>, "Media Fragment" <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
- Cc: "Yves Lafon" <ylafon@w3.org>
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:20:09 +0200, Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl> wrote: > Dear all, > > We knew that the latest blog post from Silvia is brilliant :-) > http://blog.gingertech.net/2009/09/08/uri-fragments-vs-uri-queries-for-media-fragment-addressing/ > > It has triggered some interesting discussions too (read the comments). > One of them is the reason for my question. Philip Jägenstedt wrote > "I also would be surprised if there wasn’t a lot of server software that > assumes that there will be at most 1 Range HTTP header and misbehaves > otherwise." > > A question for you Yves: > - is it allowed to have multiple Range headers in a single HTTP > request? > - how the server is supposed to interpret it if this is the case? > a) Ignore the Range request and serve the whole content > b) Pick the first Range and serves it > c) Pick a random Range among the ones specified and serves it > d) Undefined :-( > Cheers. > > Raphaël > I don't know what the specs say, but I did a little experiment with nc (netcat): A: Range: bytes=0-99 B: Range: bytes=0-99 Range: bytes=100-199 C: Range: bytes=0-99 Range: seconds=10-20 D: Range: seconds=10-20 Range: bytes=0-99 Apache 2.2: A: Content-Range: bytes 0-99 B: Content-Range: bytes 0-99 (multipart) C: Content-Range: bytes 0-99 (multipart) D: 200 OK (full resource) Conclusion: quite sane, but order matters and I don't know why I get a multipart response. IIS 5.0: A: Content-Range: bytes 0-99 B: 200 OK (full resource) C: 200 OK (full resource) D: 200 OK (full resource) Conclusion: completely broken with multiple Range headers. I wasn't very rigorous about this so there may be errors. I couldn't find a public Apache 1.3 to test. -- Philip Jägenstedt Core Developer Opera Software
Received on Thursday, 10 September 2009 09:13:04 UTC