Re: Use cases and requirements for Media Fragments: FPWD published

Congrats to the WG, well done! And big thanks to the chairs pushing it (and
us ;)

Two things, now:

1. I twitted about it and put it on IRC #swig channel, etc. and got already
feedback [1]. How do we proceed in collecting/reporting this?

2. I assume we will now soon have two documents (UC&R as well as Syntax &
Processing) so that we can implement the discussed and agreed changes (re
processing, UA++MF, etc.) soonish. I'll be off now from tomorrow on for one
week (regrets in advance for next week), so in case this happens today, I
can put in my stuff straight-forward.

Cheers,
      Michael

[1] http://chatlogs.planetrdf.com/swig/2009-05-01.html#T08-02-51

-- 
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan,
Galway, Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://sw-app.org/about.html
http://webofdata.wordpress.com/


> From: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
> Organization: CWI
> Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 09:23:51 +0200
> To: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
> Subject: Use cases and requirements for Media Fragments: FPWD published
> Resent-From: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
> Resent-Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 07:24:38 +0000
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> Our FPWD has finally been published, and the link to pass around or blog
> about is now: http://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags-reqs
> See also the press release: http://www.w3.org/News/2009#item64
> 
> I had to modify the status section, since this document will not
> entirely become a recommendation. Some parts will become, while others
> will be included in a WG Note per resolution of our last F2F meeting.
> 
> I have also corrected the various typos that Dave Singer provided me and
> added his major concerns as an editorial note.
> Finally, note that some of the links we have provided in the technology
> survey are now broken :-( I have fixed the wikipedia image link, but
> unfortunately, Google does not know neither that Cool URIs do not
> change! Consequently, the video.google.com url that shows that
> video.google.com has also fragment identifiers do not work anymore. The
> video actually has moved to YouTube, and thus the fragment syntax needs
> to be adapted :-( We can sort out that in the next iteration of the
> document ...
> 
> Best regards.
> 
>    Raphaël
> 
> -- 
> Raphaël Troncy
> CWI (Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science),
> Science Park 123, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands
> e-mail: raphael.troncy@cwi.nl & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
> Tel: +31 (0)20 - 592 4093
> Fax: +31 (0)20 - 592 4312
> Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/
> 
>

Received on Friday, 1 May 2009 08:12:03 UTC