Re: Use Cases and Requirements Wiki page updated

That's all good. I have not reverted anything, since that was
obviously confusing. I have adapted the wording a bit that's all.

Thanks,
Silvia.

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Guillaume Olivrin
<golivrin@meraka.org.za> wrote:
> Hi Silvia,
>
> It was Raphael review of UCs that prompted me to remove references to
> "primary" and "secondary" resources.
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2008Nov/0044.html
>
> I removed only two instances of "secondary resource":
>
> 1.
> ** Unique resource
> WAS
> We want to try to specify media fragments as a secondary resource for
> the complete primary media resource.
> --
> CURRENT
> We want to specify media fragments as usable parts of a resource. One
> media fragment therefore
> * is not seen as a separate resource BUT it is uniquely addressable
> * is not a "secondary resource" but a selective view of an entire
> resource.
>
>
> 2.
> ** Parent Resource
> WAS
> We want to try to make it possible to access the primary resource (i.e.
> the "context" of the fragment) through a simple change of the URI for
> the secondary resource.
> ---
> CURRENT
> We want to make it possible to access the entire resource as the
> "context" of a fragment via a simple change of the URI.
> This URI is a selective view of the resource provides a mechanism to
> focus on a fragment whilst hinting at the wider media context in which
> the fragment is included.
>
>
> I also removed instances of "primary resource" where they occurred.
>
> Hope it helps you revert some of the changes.
>
> Regards,
> Guillaume
>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 12 March 2009 09:57:40 UTC