- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:03:48 +0000
- To: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
- CC: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Raphael, > All opinions are more than welcome ... Oh I'm happy to learn that. > First, that is not possible, as we have already discussed it, since for > updating IANA registries, you need to 'own' the format, which obviously > we don't. It seems to me insane to try to register the fragment > semantics for the 100+ multimedia formats, without counting all new ones > appearing every year ... Not a matter of being sane or not. A matter of being in-line with the overall paper-trail or not. If you don't like the rules, try to change them. I didn't say that this the only option we have in principle, but the only clean solution I see in the current context. Please, could we find a language that doesn't rely on strong words in order to discuss technical, objective things. > Second, it is from my point of view not necessary. XPointer lives > without for a period of time without problem. Point taken. First, it's your POV. There may be others as well. Second, as you perfectly point out XPointer - are we aiming at a comparable high impact and adoption or do we want to produce stuff people would use? > I cannot find a registry for the SVG fragment? Is someone aware of that? I am. > Third, that was not really the question asked in the ISSUE, although, I > agree it is not completely clear. Then, please, phrase the questions so that they are unambiguous. Still I see an issue here and you may want to choose to create a new one for 'my' issue. Cheers, Michael -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan, Galway, Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://sw-app.org/about.html > From: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl> > Organization: CWI > Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:49:58 +0100 > To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org> > Cc: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, Media Fragment > <public-media-fragment@w3.org> > Subject: Re: ISSUE-2: What is the mime type of a media fragment? What is its > relation with its parent resource? > > Hi Michael, > >> Though I'm not Yves, my take on it is: > > All opinions are more than welcome ... > > [skip] > >>> From RFC2046 we learn that the MIME Type Registrations for JPEG 2000 >> (ISO/IEC15444) is specified in RFC3745 [15] where no fragments are defined, >> hence the general rules from RFC3986 apply. >> >> My conclusion: in order to obey the rules of the game, we'd need to update >> all registries of targeted media types. > > First, that is not possible, as we have already discussed it, since for > updating IANA registries, you need to 'own' the format, which obviously > we don't. It seems to me insane to try to register the fragment > semantics for the 100+ multimedia formats, without counting all new ones > appearing every year ... > > Second, it is from my point of view not necessary. XPointer lives > without for a period of time without problem. I cannot find a registry > for the SVG fragment? Is someone aware of that? > > Third, that was not really the question asked in the ISSUE, although, I > agree it is not completely clear. The server specifies using http header > what is the type of the resource is serving. Silvia's suggestion is to > encode in the URI this type, for example, in the case we extract a > keyframe from the video. Is it the only way to go? > > Best regards. > > Raphaël > > -- > Raphaël Troncy > CWI (Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science), > Science Park 123, 1098 XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands > e-mail: raphael.troncy@cwi.nl & raphael.troncy@gmail.com > Tel: +31 (0)20 - 592 4093 > Fax: +31 (0)20 - 592 4312 > Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/
Received on Tuesday, 27 January 2009 14:04:31 UTC