- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 06:41:16 +0000
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- CC: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Other proposals:
* spatio-temporal region (st-region, region)
* section
* division
* cut
Cheers,
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan,
Galway, Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://sw-app.org/about.html
http://webofdata.wordpress.com/
> From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:17:07 +1100
> To: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
> Cc: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, Media Fragment
> <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: ABNF for fragment syntax
>
> Awesome idea.
>
> So we currently have:
> * mediafragment
> * segment
> * extract
> * subpart
>
> any further ideas?
>
> Cheers,
> Silvia.
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
>>
>>> By its sheer name, 'mediafragment' too obviously just addresses the
>>> 'fragment' and not the 'query' part of the URI. Maybe we can think of
>>> something better. That's why I suggested 'segment'. We could also use
>>> 'extract' or 'subpart' - something that incorporates the extraction of
>>> a thumbnail from a video as well as the creation of a video extract.
>>
>> Let's gather proposals and start a poll :)
>>
>> --
>> Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.
>>
>> ~~Yves
>>
>>
Received on Friday, 27 February 2009 06:41:55 UTC