- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 06:41:16 +0000
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- CC: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Other proposals: * spatio-temporal region (st-region, region) * section * division * cut Cheers, Michael -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan, Galway, Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://sw-app.org/about.html http://webofdata.wordpress.com/ > From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> > Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:17:07 +1100 > To: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org> > Cc: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, Media Fragment > <public-media-fragment@w3.org> > Subject: Re: ABNF for fragment syntax > > Awesome idea. > > So we currently have: > * mediafragment > * segment > * extract > * subpart > > any further ideas? > > Cheers, > Silvia. > > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org> wrote: >> On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: >> >>> By its sheer name, 'mediafragment' too obviously just addresses the >>> 'fragment' and not the 'query' part of the URI. Maybe we can think of >>> something better. That's why I suggested 'segment'. We could also use >>> 'extract' or 'subpart' - something that incorporates the extraction of >>> a thumbnail from a video as well as the creation of a video extract. >> >> Let's gather proposals and start a poll :) >> >> -- >> Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras. >> >> ~~Yves >> >>
Received on Friday, 27 February 2009 06:41:55 UTC